The Future of Special Education: Reform or Risk?

For decades, the American education system has been under scrutiny, and with good reason. The U.S. currently ranks #40 among developed nations in education, despite having one of the highest per-student expenditures. Parents, educators, and policymakers alike agree that the system is failing—particularly when it comes to children with learning disabilities and developmental disorders. The question now is: should we continue funding a broken system or completely restructure it?

As President Donald Trump moves forward with his plan to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, a new debate has emerged. Supporters of this move argue that the current system is inefficient, bureaucratic, and incapable of providing the level of education American children deserve. Critics, on the other hand, warn that eliminating federal oversight could disproportionately harm the most vulnerable students—those with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

The Case for Restructuring Education

Many parents who have struggled with the public education system for children with disabilities argue that change is long overdue. They share stories of frustration, disappointment, and, in some cases, outright failure.

"My son was in one of the ‘best’ public school districts, yet by the fifth grade, he still couldn’t read," says one parent. "I had to pull him out and enroll him in private school. Today, he’s a doctor. But not all children get that chance—many fall through the cracks."

The argument for reform hinges on the belief that more money is not the solution. Despite billions in funding, special education programs still struggle with teacher shortages, outdated teaching methods, and excessive red tape.

Proponents of decentralizing education suggest that returning power to states and local communities will foster competition, encourage innovation, and allow parents greater choice in how their children are educated. Charter schools, private institutions, and homeschooling are often touted as better alternatives to the current system.

The Risks of Removing the Department of Education

On the other side of the argument, disability advocates and education experts express deep concern about the potential consequences of dismantling federal oversight. Currently, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) ensures that over 8 million students with disabilities receive a free and appropriate public education. The U.S. Department of Education is responsible for enforcing IDEA, monitoring compliance, and holding schools accountable for failing to provide necessary services.

Without federal oversight, critics argue that states with already underfunded or mismanaged special education programs could cut services, leaving families with few options. The National Education Association warns that eliminating the Department of Education could lead to inconsistent special education policies across states, creating disparities in the quality of services provided.

Dr. Craig Escudé, President of IntellectAbility, emphasizes that children with IDD require individualized instruction to thrive. "Education tailored to meet individual needs benefits people of all abilities. Specialized education is necessary, and when it is not available, it can have a devastating impact on a child's development, independence, and overall well-being."

Furthermore, special education programs already face a crisis in staffing. According to the U.S. Department of Education, 80% of states reported shortages of special education teachers in the 2023-2024 school year. Removing federal support could further strain resources and discourage qualified educators from entering the field.

Finding a Middle Ground

The reality is that both sides of this debate share a common goal: a better education system for all children. While some believe that the system should be overhauled entirely, others insist that removing federal oversight would cause more harm than good. Perhaps the answer lies in a compromise—one that maintains critical protections for students with disabilities while allowing for more localized control and innovation.

One potential solution is restructuring federal funding, ensuring that special education programs receive the resources they need while holding local districts accountable for results. Expanding school choice programs, investing in special education teacher training, and streamlining bureaucracy could also help improve outcomes without dismantling essential protections.

The future of American education is at a crossroads. Whether through restructuring, decentralization, or a combination of both, one thing is clear: the system as it stands is failing. The challenge ahead lies in finding a way to fix it without leaving our most vulnerable students behind.

Related Articles:

• The Role of Technology in Shaping the Future of Education
• 4 of the Best Countries for Children’s Education